Today held a day to install the script directory of articles and sites, creating categories, making the logo and start of all this web space. What I spodviglo on this kind of activity? Yes, I've got just the domain Hyves.su, that Google screwed for life PR7, so I thought it was better than he is in Sapa otlezhivat, it is possible to rotate the TIC and make it a sweet domain name for a directory of articles. At first, when the catalog will gain the trust, all will be free, although the harsh conditions – the uniqueness of articles 100%, no more than one link, reciprocal link is required, etc. Governing Body will still by hand, then put the script. In short, the elite article directory sites and will do that will not be afraid filter AGS-17 and other evil .. buchie algorithms.
TIC plan to increase the exchange of articles with Liex. It has long been her work as webmaster, now I will be in a cast advertisers. Admin of this exchange has written detailed instructions a $ 40 increase TITski 100 and above. So the trick is done, the main thing is not to be lazy. Here just now bought a couple of articles on Xap.ru and decided to check the content for uniqueness. Articles albeit pennies worth, but the uniqueness must be present, otherwise what's the point in selling them, let alone buying. Chose to test two online service, and two programs. The text of article available in the post I will not, will understand why! Article about the new online shop Nokia.
antiplagiat.ru – 100%. What is not tested on this service, always gave 100%, even in flagrant plagiarism. Zero confidence in this service and use it not recommended, except that to calm kopipasterskoy soul. miratools.ru – GAP: 1 Shingle: 9 unique: 96.97%. I would like to believe, but too close to the previous version. In principle, the service is not bad, but sometimes flattered! And I do not recommend you to use. DCFinder found only one match. Moved from the link – yes, a complete coincidence. But as it turned out, not only. Let's move on. Prog Advego Plagiatus – Uniqueness: 32%. I was pleasantly surprised by the working capacity of the program: specified, all references to a possible similarity prtsentnoy. Test showed that I had bought low-quality content copyright. Whew! Conclusion: buy content for nothing is not very good, although the attractive idea. Do not use for this purpose prepared content Xap.ru. A check for the uniqueness of the content would recommend Advego Plagiatus. Check this post in AP – 100% unique.